Sharrows seriously relegated in the Delaware MUTCD

 

Delaware 2013 Bicycle Friendly State “Report Card”


WRA

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: Why Delaware Needs the Bike and Pedestrian Improvements Program at DelDOT

Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: Why Delaware Needs the Bike and Pedestrian Improvements Program at DelDOT

Between May of 1997 and March of 2008 (over 10 years), Delaware’s unemployment rate was between 3 and 4%. But for the last four years, unemployment has stubbornly...

 

Will the Delaware General Assembly Vote For Bike and Pedestrian Improvements This Year?

Will the Delaware General Assembly Vote For Bike and Pedestrian Improvements This Year?

We know what we want. And it all comes back to the “Bike and Pedestrian Improvements” program authorization for the Delaware Department of Transportation. We...

 

News Journal: “State agencies draw up a dream trail for cyclists”

News Journal: “State agencies draw up a dream trail for cyclists”

by Melissa Nann Burke The News Journal February 15, 2013 Relatively few Delaware workers commute by bike, but they might reconsider when cyclists are whizzing...

 
 

Article Categories

Article Archives


A side by side comparison of the National Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) with the Delaware version, adopted directly from it with revisions by DelDOT, reveals a stark contrast where Shared Lane Markings (aka “Sharrows”) are concerned.

Both contain the following from section 9C.07 “Shared Lane Marking”:

Option:
01. The Shared Lane Marking may be used to:
A. Assist bicyclists with lateral positioning in a shared lane with on-street parallel parking in order to reduce the chance of a bicyclist’s impacting the open door of a parked vehicle,
B. Assist bicyclists with lateral positioning in lanes that are too narrow for a motor vehicle and a bicycle to travel side by side within the same traffic lane,
C. Alert road users of the lateral location bicyclists are likely to occupy within the traveled way,
D. Encourage safe passing of bicyclists by motorists, and
E. Reduce the incidence of wrong-way bicycling.

Guidance:
02. The Shared Lane Marking should not be placed on roadways that have a speed limit above 35 mph.

Delaware revision only:   2A. The Shared Lane Marking should only be placed on roadways with on street parking.

vs the National MUTCD  which also includes the following:

Standard:
03. Shared Lane Markings shall not be used on shoulders or in designated bicycle lanes.

Guidance:
04. If used in a shared lane with on-street parallel parking, Shared Lane Markings should be placed so that the centers of the markings are at least 11 feet from the face of the curb, or from the edge of the pavement where there is no curb.

05. If used on a street without on-street parking that has an outside travel lane that is less than 14 feet wide, the centers of the Shared Lane Markings should be at least 4 feet from the face of the curb, or from the edge of the pavement where there is no curb.

06. If used, the Shared Lane Marking should be placed immediately after an intersection and spaced at intervals not greater than 250 feet thereafter.

Option:
07. Section 9B.06 describes a Bicycles May Use Full Lane sign that may be used in addition to or instead of the Shared Lane Marking to inform road users that bicyclists might occupy the travel lane.

THE ABOVE ADDED GUIDANCE IS NOT MENTIONED IN THE DE MUTCD

Conclusion
What might this mean for bicycle advocacy in Delaware? In the DE MUTCD’s current form, the following – permissible by national standards – will be difficult to achieve:

1) Gap closure between other bikeway infrastructure (where the gap is no more than 1/2 mile)

2) To mark bicycle boulevards (great video of how they do this in Portland HERE).

3) On a street going downhill, where a bike lane on the other side going uphill exists.

4) Streets where cyclists can keep up with traffic (rule of thumb: 15 mph speed limit or less) minus parking.

5) Guidance through intersections for bicyclists where space is shared.

On a positive note

Advocates are working with DelDOT Traffic Engineering on a research and design proposal that would allow sharrow(s) in the left-most portion of right turn-only lanes, and open or dash the solid white taper line. The project is currently headed up by UD’s Civil and Environmental Engineering Group. Stay tuned for progress on this front.

See Mia Birk’s take on Sharrow use HERE, including the 4 above.

 

BIKE DELAWARE is a member-supported nonprofit organization dedicated to making bicycling a safe, convenient and fun transportation option in Delaware.

Recent Articles

Delaware the 5th most bicycle-friendly state in America? “I figured either LAB had gone crazy or else I had.”

Delaware the 5th most bicycle-friendly state in America? “I figured either LAB had gone crazy or else I had.”

  “When I first saw the headline, I figured either LAB had gone crazy or else I had.” – recent comment by Bike Delaware reader Just a few...

 

TODAY (Friday): City of Wilmington Bike-to-Work Day 2013

TODAY (Friday): City of Wilmington Bike-to-Work Day 2013

The City of Wilmington, Bike Wilmington and its supporters/sponsors are proud to hold the third annual Bike-to-Work Day (May 17th). Bike-to-Work Day is a National...

 

The Last Time the National Transportation Safety Board Made a Bike Infrastructure Recommendation was in 1972

The Last Time the National Transportation Safety Board Made a Bike Infrastructure Recommendation was in 1972

  Cross-posted from Systemic Failure Each year there are tens of thousands of fatalities on the nation’s highways. A disproportionate [number] of those...

 

Today: The Ride of Silence

Today: The Ride of Silence

On May 15, 2013 at 7:00 PM, the northern Delaware 10 mile Ride of Silence will begin at the Ed Oliver Golf Club in Wilmington.  Cyclists will take to the roads...

 
 
 

2 Comments

  1. Yo!

    Check on page 9C-18 (40). There are more reasons for why DelDOT is supporting their claim about Sharrows. I don’t totally agree with there conclusions but you didn’t include them in the post above.

  2. Frank Warnock says:

    Thanks. Next time we post on this topic, I will be sure to include it. However, as I’m sure you agree, 1-5 above are specific uses (wayfinding and guidance) that have gained serious traction in true bike friendly cities. DelDOT’s reasoning seems based on adding them in a lane for no purpose other than awareness. This lack of basic knowledge is further proof that we need complete streets training for DOT engineers.

Post a Comment