• Can Traffic Calming Reduce Crime in Wilmington?

    by  • November 27, 2013 • Engineering, Federal Funding, Traffic Control • 7 Comments

    You can’t make people use streets they have no reason to use. You can’t make people watch streets they do not want to watch. Safety on the streets by surveillance and mutual policing of one another sounds grim, but in real life it is not grim. The safety of the street works best, most casually, and with least frequent taint of hostility or suspicion precisely where people are using and most enjoying the streets voluntarily and are least conscious, normally, that they are policing.” – Jane Jacobs, The Death and Life of Great American Cities

     

    new_yorkToday, New York City excites both admiration and envy for its wealth and quality of life. It is also notable for its low levels of crime. In city of over 8 million people, there were 414 murders last year. That works out to 5 homicides for every 100,000 people.

    By way of contrast Delaware’s largest city, Wilmington, had a murder rate in 2012 more than 5 times higher than New York’s.

    But in 1990 – just 23 years ago – New York’s homicide rate was higher than Wilmington’s is today.

    Effective policing is only part of the story of New York’s 80% decline in murders. As Jane Jacobs observed in the Death and Life of Great American Cities, formal “policing” (by actual police) is essentially the last resort. The most effective policing is done, naturally, by everyday people simply going about their business on the street. New York’s vibrant street life is part of the story of its decline in murders though its relative contribution is hard to delineate because of the simultaneous changes in police practice.

    West Palm Beach, Florida

    Photo credit: Ian Lockwood Intersection in West Palm Beach before and after traffic calming.

    Photo credit: Ian Lockwood
    Intersection in West Palm Beach before and after traffic calming.

     

    In other places, however, the importance of traffic calming as a strategy to promote vibrant street life and prevent crime is not entangled with other factors. West Palm Beach in Florida, a city almost exactly the same size (80,000) as the city of Wilmington, offers a particularly clear example:

    “Traffic calming in West Palm Beach was initially used as a response to resident complaints of motor vehicle speeding, cut-through motor vehicle traffic, and the overall negative perception of drivers’ behavior within their neighborhoods. The City soon found that the traffic calming projects had additional external benefits. One of which was a reduction of crimes related to poor street environments (e.g. prostitution and drugs).

    “Traffic calming caused several phases of the revitalization cycle to occur which resulted in a reduction in the aforementioned crimes and the rejuvenation of depressed commercial corridors and inner-city neighborhoods. First, the projects physically altered driver behavior, leading to slower, more respectful motorists and reduced the amount of cut-through or non-neighborhood traffic within the older inner-city neighborhoods. The reduction in speeds and of the perceived dangers of the vehicles lead to increased natural surveillance through the presence of more pedestrians, cyclists, and in-line skaters. Existing residents and businesses invested in renovations and property improvements. The increases in neighborhood pride and the increase of natural surveillance led to the return of more businesses and residents. All of which continues to snowball and contribute to the reduction in street crime within the areas of study.”  [Lockwood and Stillings]

     

    A Traffic Calming Strategy For Wilmington

    Photo credit: NACTO

    Photo credit: NACTO

    Why not start traffic calming lots of intersections in the city of Wilmington tomorrow? Lots of reasons, starting with funding, politics and traffic engineers (who are  not always the biggest fans of re-designing streets with the explicit goal of actually slowing cars and trucks). But we need to start somewhere. And the best place to start, in my opinion, is a “neighborway” (with very little motor vehicle traffic) that connects city neighborhoods with downtown Wilmington.

    Like a lot of the best ideas in public policy, a neighborway addresses multiple public priorities simultaneously. It’s a particular type of traffic calming that creates a more vibrant street and also creates a low traffic stress bicycle route that appeals to casual and inexperienced cyclists to cycle for everyday, routine transportation. It’s a strategy for Wilmington to start to create a more vibrant and appealing built environment and a more multi-modal transportation system while, simultaneously, reaping the public safety dividends of increased “natural surveillance.”

    Let us know in the comments section below what you think of a traffic-calmed “neighborway” for Wilmington. Would you use a neighborway to get around in Wilmington on a bike? We’ll pass your comments along to city staff.

     

     

      James Wilson is the executive director of Bike Delaware.

     

     

     

     

    RELATED: 

    How to Make a Great “Neighborway” in Wilmington

    West Palm Beach Traffic Calming

    A New Way of Understanding “Eyes on the Street”

    Fight Street Crime with Speed Bumps and Crosswalks

    • Jane Jacobs on neighborhoods, placemaking, and active living

    About

    7 Responses to Can Traffic Calming Reduce Crime in Wilmington?

    1. Elizabeth Lockman
      November 27, 2013 at 2:46 pm

      Really enjoyed this and shared with my Cool Spring Tilton neighbors – thanks!

    2. Laura Philon
      November 27, 2013 at 11:01 pm

      I’m very much in favor of this idea. I also support the proposed project linking Wilmington and Newark with a non-motorized multipurpose (bike) path! I can see no down-side to investing in these projects, here in the Wilmington area (or in any populated area, for that matter!). The reasons you cited in this article are sufficient (safer, more utilized streets, and quieter communities), but add to that the increase in opportunity for residents to get more exercise safely/regularly, and the decrease in use of fossil-fuel burning vehicles, and it’s win-win-win! More, and safer non-automotive transportation should be a high priority of this, and every city. As climate change ramps up, and fossil fuel supplies wind down, we should be doing everything we can to build infrastructure that supports carbon-neutral living.
      Laura Philon
      Wilmington In Transition

    3. Amy Wilburn
      November 30, 2013 at 7:57 pm

      Wilmington is a natural for “neighborways”, with it’s large number of narrow, lower speed roads and relatively small number of high traffic volume, higher speed roads. Over the upcoming months and years, Wilmington should look at traffic calming where appropriate, tweaking the one-way network (including counter flow bike lanes), adding bike lanes and cycletracks to stretches of some of the major roads, and putting sharrows and signage to good use. Through the use of a TA grant (at a modest cost), Wilmington is in the process of creating a network of bike boulevards, beginning as early as next spring. I hope that Bike DE, along with other bike related organizations and cyclists in general, will actively support the current TA grant which has already been through the design process and is almost ready for implementation. While more work will need to be done on Wilmington’s roads, it is a very good start. As for making a city safer by encouraging more people to walk and bike, I absolutely agree. From personal experience, over the years of biking and walking for transportation, I have reported both crimes and fires. Although none of us live within the city limits, my entire family bikes in Wilmington, either as a commuter or to visit friends, or for errands or entertainment. Whether morning, afternoon or evening, we are your eyes and ears, Wilmington. There are definitely others like us. But it would be wonderful if more residents and visitors left their cars at home and biked and walked through the city.

    4. Shane Hoffman
      December 2, 2013 at 10:19 am

      Great idea! I’ll add that I had an opportunity to move back to my hometown of Baltimore about a year ago, and one of the reasons that I ultimately turned it down was the quality of my neighborhood in Wilmington (Trolley Square), where my family can walk or bicycle to an enormous variety of places that meet our needs (stores, services) or that we enjoy (parks, museums, theaters). Wilmington really has the potential to be a gem of a city because of its compact size and the wealth of cultural attractions and parks that are easily connected. Improving infrastructure for bicyclists and pedestrians could have enormous benefits,

    5. Kelly
      December 2, 2013 at 10:33 am

      I think this is a WONDERFUL idea. I live on Lovering Ave and would welcome something like this being put in place in the city.

    6. Joseph P. Lazorick
      December 3, 2013 at 3:55 am

      I agree with Shane Hoffmans comments. In addition if there were better/safer routes to cycle into the city from the Pike Creek, Hockessin areas it would even be better. It would be nice to be able to get into the city when they are having festivals etc. on a nice safe route. Cycling around the Riverfront along with the Brandywine Creek, Rockford Park and Trolley Square areas is a nice ride from Pike Creek. The city has some nice climbs also. The ride from the Riverfront west to the St. Francis Hospital area is a good climb. …………..Joe

    7. Pingback: WellingtonStBikeLane.info | Why We Want Separated Bicycle Infrastructure

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *